The Management of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) according to the Auditor-General’s report on the public accounts of Ghana, public boards, corporations and other statutory institutions for the period ended 31 December 2020 has entered into some significant foreign contracts without the necessary parliamentary approval.
READ MORE: KNUST SRC President sends message to gov’t on International Youth Day
According to the A-G, the government should punish the Management of GNPC for breaching the public procurement law.
“Contrary to the above provisions, we noted from the sampled records reviewed that the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) signed and awarded five (5) international business contracts to five foreign suppliers or contractors using Single-Source method in four of those transactions and in one instance used the Restricted Tendering method without seeking for the necessary Parliamentary approvals. The five contracts totalled US$34,165,235.15, and £464,963.13.
READ MORE: A-G Report: Public boards, other statutory institutions blow ¢12.85 billion on irregularities
“This practice has the tendency of not allowing the intentions of the promulgators of the law (1992 Constitution) inure to the benefit of the State. It also denies the Lawmakers the opportunity to make inputs towards such transactions. Thus, the absence of the above could plunge GNPC into paying for higher contract sums and possible judgment debts,” the report said.
It added: “We recommended that Management of GNPC should be sanctioned in accordance with Section 92 of the Public Procurement Act 2003, (Act 663) as amended for breaching the Public Procurement Law”.
READ MORE: ’Sika Nu Aba’: Dubai Sheikh refunds Sputnik V vaccines scandal money to gov’t
Despite attempts by the Management of GNPC to explain the breaches, the Auditor General maintained its audit recommendation should still stand.
“Management explained that the products involved in the transactions in question were all proprietary products that needed to be procured from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Further, Management stated that it sought and obtained PPA’s approval for those transactions and that the items involved were captured in the approved annual budget of the corporation which was approved by Parliament, as well as its approved procurement plans for the respective periods.
READ MORE: Dr. Bawumia needs a refresher course in Economics – Ricketts-Hagan
“The said budgets were not made available for our review, more so, from our audit point of view, Parliamentary approval of the Corporation’s budget does not imply approval for international business contracts since the budget does not indicate the procurement method to use neither does it indicate the vendors to deal with.
“We reiterated our audit recommendation as stated above”.
