Kwasi Afrifa, the lawyer who has accused the Chief Justice of bribery has sued the General Legal Council accusing the body of perpetuating an illegality.
According to him, the Council’s meeting of July 15, 2021, which found him guilty of his bribery claims against the CJ is illegal and an act of injustice, Starr News sources have said.
He is praying an Accra High Court to set aside the decision of the GLC.
The GLC announced last week that Mr Afrifa was unable to prove his claims against the CJ when given the chance to do so. The lawyer is however challenging the claim.
Below are details of the charges GLC against the lawyer
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 9(11) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969 (LI. 613) as amended.
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, having been informed of an alleged unethical conduct in the office of the Chief Justice by your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI, the Complainant herein, failed to protect the sanctity and integrity of the legal profession by failing to disclose the allegation of bribery against the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana to the Disciplinary Committee of the Judicial Council or any other statutory body for an inquiry.
COUNT 2
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 6(1) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969 (II. 613) as amended.
READ MORE: IGP Akuffo Dampare promises #FixTheCountry protestors
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in a preliminary inquiry before the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council voluntarily admitted that you failed to issue any receipts to your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI for the payment of legal fees thereby committing a professional misconduct.
COUNT 3
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 2(2) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969 (L.I. 613) as amended.
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in a conversation with your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI about an alleged judicial manipulation by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana, omitted to defend the reputation of the legal profession, and rather facilitated the commission of the alleged bribery offence by refunding to the Complainant legal fees you were legally and duly entitled to thereby failing to uphold the dignity and high standing of the legal profession.
READ MORE: Labour Commission must protect UTAG members – Austin Gamey
COUNT 4
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 2(2) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969 (L.1. 613) as amended.
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in a preliminary inquiry before the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council voluntarily admitted that in responding to the complaint brought against you by your former client, Obranu Kwasi Atta VI. you forwarded a scanned copy of the said response which had information relating to your representation of the said client to a third party, via social media platform (WhatsApp), thereby failing to uphold the dignity and high standing of the legal profession.
COUNT 5
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 9(7) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969 (L.L. 613) as amended.
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in your dealings with your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI, did not behave with utmost honesty and frankness when in a conversation with the said Complainant about alleged judicial manipulation by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana, facilitated the commission of the alleged bribery offence by refunding to the Complainant legal fees you were legally and duly entitled to.
READ MORE: Edward Boateng appointed Managing Director of TOR
COUNT 6
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 52 (a) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (L.I. 2423).
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in responding to a complaint brought against you by your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI, made a reckless statement suggesting judicial manipulation by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana which you knew or ought to have known that it was false.
COUNT 7
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
READ MORE: Fake COVID-19 Test: NOGUCHI won’t accept results from unapproved test kits
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 89 (c) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (L.I. 2423).
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in responding to a complaint brought against you by your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI made a reckless statement imputing judicial manipulation by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana, thereby engaging in a conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.
COUNT 8
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 61 (b) (ii) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (L.1. 2423).
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in your response to a complaint brought against you by your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI, made a reckless statement imputing judicial manipulation by the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ghana, thereby diminishing public confidence in the administration of Justice.
COUNT 9
READ MORE: ‘Send Me Nudes’: If you are not in this category, ‘bounce’ – KiDi advises
STATEMENT OF MISCONDUCT
Misconduct in a professional respect, contrary to rule 21 (3) (b) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 2020 (LI. 2423).
PARTICULARS OF MISCONDUCT
That you, in a preliminary inquiry before the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council voluntarily admitted that in responding to the complaint brought against you by your former client, Ogyeedom Obranu Kwasi Atta VI. you forwarded a scanned copy of the said response which had information relating to your representation of the said client to a third party, via social media platform (WhatsApp), thereby making the information relating to your representation of your former client public.
